Wednesday, October 28, 2009
NCP party need not join congress in maharashtra!
NCP had failed miserably in maha elections as people lost faith. It is better if it does not to die a natural death as a party, it should not take home, finance and other portfolios. But it will not listen safter all it made knownto maharashtrians that it wants to make quick money at the cost of the State.Then it will die may be most of its members want to jooin Congress after all it was a splinter group and this group wanted to make money anso floated party. That story is over even Sharad Pawar knows it.
Sunday, October 25, 2009
swedish academy...
SWEDISH ACADEMYOF SCIENCES
MADE PROPER CHOICE IN AWARDING ECONOMICS? NOBEL PRIZE
(IN FAVOUR OF Professors Oliver Williamson (Economics department in his transaction cost theory) and MADAM ELINOR OSTROM OF UNIVERSITY of California, Berkeley (USA) OF POLITICAL SCIENCE DEPARTMENT, (in her social economic analysis) TO PROVE SOCIAL ANIMAL INSTINCTS IN MAN IN HER ILLUMINATIMG WORK ON NON-MARKET INSTITUTIONS IN HER STUDIES ON SEVERAL INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS OF USER REGULATED USE OF COMMONS AS SUPERIOR TO PRIVATISATION OR RELIANCE ON SOLELY ON GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS?)
(BY Dr. G Balakrishnan, professor emeritus and visiting faculty in business schools- managerial economics & Corporate strategy and a constitutional lawyer, a former AFP JOURNALIST)
Stockholm reported Elinor Ostrom defied conventional wisdom with studies that showed that user managed properties ? such as community fish stocks or woodland areas were better run than standard theories predicted, by stating, ?Since we have found that bureaucrats sometimes do not have the correct information while citizens and users of resources do, we hope it helps encourage a sense of capacity and power. ? Her view in her work reflects a principle that people are willing to accept AVOIDABLE PERSONAL COST TO ENFORCE RULES THAT BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY. This is so because the upbringing of child in any family teaches the child this kind of life and that invariably becomes second nature in every man and that is social economics BASED PSYCHOLOGY of some sacrificing tendency in man in order of benefitting the community.
Her fellow winner professor Oliver Williamson of California university work on TCT (transaction cost theory) is a cost reduction mechanism in any product or service. That does mean ?outsourcing theory? (RELATION SPECIFIC INVESTMENT) which made many MNCs to outsource their work from companies like ?Infosys? and like.
Though Ram Singh of Delhi School of Economics just eulogized in his article, in Economic Times (issue of 14 october,09), of the Times of India group firm, and yet conflict resolutions in contracts though less in vertically integrating firm, there will be conflicts of interests, in TCT. So there is nothing like that you always get final answer by one solution.
Neo Classical theory worked for some time excessively depending on markets and market forces driving consumption to the tether ends leading to excessive consumption and that lead to serious wastages, like in foods wastages in five star hotels which reduce availability of essential commodities and that creates unnecessary artificial rise in costs of essential commodities and make poor man not to get his share of food in the society.
So centralized work regulation affects the local common man right from his daily necessities of food, shelter and clothing, and so on, and that situational analysis helped Ostrom and Williamson to research new factors in political economy, an inter disciplinary approach of descriptive sciences ? politics, economics, sociology, psychology and both inductive and deductive logics in a cohesive manner.
Previous notion was that common property was poorly managed and should be regulated centrally or privatized (a typical view challenged by Panchayati Raj system and India introduced/revived Panchayati raj system in 1991 by then Prime Minister Narasimha Rao out of own experience in Indian politics).
Nobel winners have well-recognized by their researches the views Ostrom now enunciated in her seminary work, being a political scientist (political economist) and that way inter disciplinary work only is an eye opener.
Prof Oliver Williamson (also of university of California) recognized in his research (on TCT) on analysis of conflict resolution for the ?over the last three decades and these contributions have indeed advanced economic governance research from the fringe to the forefront of scientific attention?, the committee observed.
According to Ostrom ?there are many many people who have struggled mightily and to be chosen for this prize is a great honor I am still a little bit in shock.?
Anyway it is indeed a corrective to many conventional economists to change their thinking process if social economics is a criterion.
Recent swirl in economic development overly worked on market is given a short shrift that markets alone cannot determine real factors, like protagonists view of ?Consumerism? which led to serious debts even to nations tying them to several years of debts and also monetary expansion without sensible views tied up thought to irrational economic development which led to Nandhigam problem in West Bengal and Maoist risings and declaring war by union government of India without realizing what will be the after effects. After all you have to protect all people?s living in an unequal society, a norm of the world.
It is a paradox that global in thinking while acting locally. Always local views are invariably governed by local needs, like rivers, climate, and waters and in these you will have to work holistically and not egoistically like thinking of connecting rivers.
In China also the government has to break the dam constructed across river Hoe-en-ho, just because of dam will cause very serious floods, in that river of sorrow. What is good at one place need not necessarily be always good and that good has to change on and often due to very many factors and that thought found well defined explanation in the Nobel laureates work! Too much irrational building of highways will bring havocs in climate and monsoons, have to be learned by governments is the lesson of this research! (Ends)
MADE PROPER CHOICE IN AWARDING ECONOMICS? NOBEL PRIZE
(IN FAVOUR OF Professors Oliver Williamson (Economics department in his transaction cost theory) and MADAM ELINOR OSTROM OF UNIVERSITY of California, Berkeley (USA) OF POLITICAL SCIENCE DEPARTMENT, (in her social economic analysis) TO PROVE SOCIAL ANIMAL INSTINCTS IN MAN IN HER ILLUMINATIMG WORK ON NON-MARKET INSTITUTIONS IN HER STUDIES ON SEVERAL INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS OF USER REGULATED USE OF COMMONS AS SUPERIOR TO PRIVATISATION OR RELIANCE ON SOLELY ON GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS?)
(BY Dr. G Balakrishnan, professor emeritus and visiting faculty in business schools- managerial economics & Corporate strategy and a constitutional lawyer, a former AFP JOURNALIST)
Stockholm reported Elinor Ostrom defied conventional wisdom with studies that showed that user managed properties ? such as community fish stocks or woodland areas were better run than standard theories predicted, by stating, ?Since we have found that bureaucrats sometimes do not have the correct information while citizens and users of resources do, we hope it helps encourage a sense of capacity and power. ? Her view in her work reflects a principle that people are willing to accept AVOIDABLE PERSONAL COST TO ENFORCE RULES THAT BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY. This is so because the upbringing of child in any family teaches the child this kind of life and that invariably becomes second nature in every man and that is social economics BASED PSYCHOLOGY of some sacrificing tendency in man in order of benefitting the community.
Her fellow winner professor Oliver Williamson of California university work on TCT (transaction cost theory) is a cost reduction mechanism in any product or service. That does mean ?outsourcing theory? (RELATION SPECIFIC INVESTMENT) which made many MNCs to outsource their work from companies like ?Infosys? and like.
Though Ram Singh of Delhi School of Economics just eulogized in his article, in Economic Times (issue of 14 october,09), of the Times of India group firm, and yet conflict resolutions in contracts though less in vertically integrating firm, there will be conflicts of interests, in TCT. So there is nothing like that you always get final answer by one solution.
Neo Classical theory worked for some time excessively depending on markets and market forces driving consumption to the tether ends leading to excessive consumption and that lead to serious wastages, like in foods wastages in five star hotels which reduce availability of essential commodities and that creates unnecessary artificial rise in costs of essential commodities and make poor man not to get his share of food in the society.
So centralized work regulation affects the local common man right from his daily necessities of food, shelter and clothing, and so on, and that situational analysis helped Ostrom and Williamson to research new factors in political economy, an inter disciplinary approach of descriptive sciences ? politics, economics, sociology, psychology and both inductive and deductive logics in a cohesive manner.
Previous notion was that common property was poorly managed and should be regulated centrally or privatized (a typical view challenged by Panchayati Raj system and India introduced/revived Panchayati raj system in 1991 by then Prime Minister Narasimha Rao out of own experience in Indian politics).
Nobel winners have well-recognized by their researches the views Ostrom now enunciated in her seminary work, being a political scientist (political economist) and that way inter disciplinary work only is an eye opener.
Prof Oliver Williamson (also of university of California) recognized in his research (on TCT) on analysis of conflict resolution for the ?over the last three decades and these contributions have indeed advanced economic governance research from the fringe to the forefront of scientific attention?, the committee observed.
According to Ostrom ?there are many many people who have struggled mightily and to be chosen for this prize is a great honor I am still a little bit in shock.?
Anyway it is indeed a corrective to many conventional economists to change their thinking process if social economics is a criterion.
Recent swirl in economic development overly worked on market is given a short shrift that markets alone cannot determine real factors, like protagonists view of ?Consumerism? which led to serious debts even to nations tying them to several years of debts and also monetary expansion without sensible views tied up thought to irrational economic development which led to Nandhigam problem in West Bengal and Maoist risings and declaring war by union government of India without realizing what will be the after effects. After all you have to protect all people?s living in an unequal society, a norm of the world.
It is a paradox that global in thinking while acting locally. Always local views are invariably governed by local needs, like rivers, climate, and waters and in these you will have to work holistically and not egoistically like thinking of connecting rivers.
In China also the government has to break the dam constructed across river Hoe-en-ho, just because of dam will cause very serious floods, in that river of sorrow. What is good at one place need not necessarily be always good and that good has to change on and often due to very many factors and that thought found well defined explanation in the Nobel laureates work! Too much irrational building of highways will bring havocs in climate and monsoons, have to be learned by governments is the lesson of this research! (Ends)
what is education?
What is education? Is it that is taught in schools? Is it reliable for you? What do you expect in education? Whether the present systems of education really insure your future? IF not how will you go about?
(By Dr. Balakrishnan, former professor, Ex., Education Counselor, advocate, independent director in public limited companies, and visiting faculty in management studies (Bombay/Mumbai/ Pune/ Bangalore universities) UGC resource person attached to Bangalore University.)
Education is the means of art of living, in one?s life sojourn. Routes are different. No school teaches one to the capabilities one has. That is the real problem. Schools provide some set kind of topics or subjects as decided by government, under so called syllabus and curriculum.
Every boy and girl has a particular talent and that need not neatly fit into these so called curriculum / syllabus. You see film actors and theatre actors are talented to portray a role and accordingly the director selects on the basis of story line. You will note all actors will not fit the roles the story line may need. Those that fit the role have the opportunity to act, and that one leads to a box office rating. If you use an actor on the basis of strait jacketed education qualification, then naturally you will find film will miserably fail. So the actor should be exactly able to portray the role to the best possible satisfaction of the spectators.
You can make a technician by the present system of technical education, but when that technician is put to do a job he needs such creative abilities and if he does not he will create a drab cinema. Cinema is totally dependent on actors and hence they are paid astronomical sums of money. Similarly every one has some caliber but if you do not give relevant education fitting his caliber, then he naturally fails. So the word education is to fit in to your talents and what is done all over the world today, you have to fit in your talents to the education provided and hence education is some kind of straight jacket mechanism. Why students drop out, just because that education is not compatible to his talent. But interestingly, we shed all kinds of crocodile tears for the student dropping out of the course. That is the vast gap is created by the present day education. Those who do this straight jacket education will not get really any mark in life, except some make believe kind of capacity, like the people in LEHMAN BROS who all contrived the world economy to go into gloom, in USA, with all kinds of false promises and lies.
Every one created by God is just unique and every one need unique kind of education and some may fit in some collective education but that does not mean all will be fitted into it. So education policies have steadily failed all over centuries and in fact education system decently failed. People run for this decently failed education system.
Parents without knowing the talent of their children submit them to some so called schools/colleges/universities, as if the end of education is in those institutions but it is a sad mistake committed by every one as if every one thinks that he knows his child better but in fact child knows about him or her better.
If that freedom is available to the child it need not wait for government alms, under so called reservations and the like, after all every child can carve out its future much more better than the so called governments? thinking process. So it is said SARASWATI/MINERVA bestows particular talent in every child world through the process of procreation.
We did not learn education in ancient India from Europe. We had our own system of gurukul and we had our Nalanda and Taxila and similar such in India so too in china in ancient times. We developed temple architecture, management so too China Pagodas and Chinese management.
Present system will doom Indians for ever.
All we need is development several hundreds of subjects and list them, including languages. Give options for students to pick up subjects that interest them. This system will have to be adopted in all kinds of crafts and technical courses in all levels of schools, colleges and depending upon the kin of pupils or students, the government should make arrangement of teachers? mobility to reach out to students. There will be full attendance in classes and also teachers will find their interests expressed and that means they will not absent in the classes, subject to necessary supervision, if we really mean education for future generation.(ends)
What is education? Is it that is taught in schools? Is it reliable for you? What do you expect in education? Whether the present systems of education really insure your future? IF not how will you go about?
(By Dr. Balakrishnan, former professor, Ex., Education Counselor, advocate, independent director in public limited companies, and visiting faculty in management studies (Bombay/Mumbai/ Pune/ Bangalore universities) UGC resource person attached to Bangalore University.)
Education is the means of art of living, in one?s life sojourn. Routes are different. No school teaches one to the capabilities one has. That is the real problem. Schools provide some set kind of topics or subjects as decided by government, under so called syllabus and curriculum.
Every boy and girl has a particular talent and that need not neatly fit into these so called curriculum / syllabus. You see film actors and theatre actors are talented to portray a role and accordingly the director selects on the basis of story line. You will note all actors will not fit the roles the story line may need. Those that fit the role have the opportunity to act, and that one leads to a box office rating. If you use an actor on the basis of strait jacketed education qualification, then naturally you will find film will miserably fail. So the actor should be exactly able to portray the role to the best possible satisfaction of the spectators.
You can make a technician by the present system of technical education, but when that technician is put to do a job he needs such creative abilities and if he does not he will create a drab cinema. Cinema is totally dependent on actors and hence they are paid astronomical sums of money. Similarly every one has some caliber but if you do not give relevant education fitting his caliber, then he naturally fails. So the word education is to fit in to your talents and what is done all over the world today, you have to fit in your talents to the education provided and hence education is some kind of straight jacket mechanism. Why students drop out, just because that education is not compatible to his talent. But interestingly, we shed all kinds of crocodile tears for the student dropping out of the course. That is the vast gap is created by the present day education. Those who do this straight jacket education will not get really any mark in life, except some make believe kind of capacity, like the people in LEHMAN BROS who all contrived the world economy to go into gloom, in USA, with all kinds of false promises and lies.
Every one created by God is just unique and every one need unique kind of education and some may fit in some collective education but that does not mean all will be fitted into it. So education policies have steadily failed all over centuries and in fact education system decently failed. People run for this decently failed education system.
Parents without knowing the talent of their children submit them to some so called schools/colleges/universities, as if the end of education is in those institutions but it is a sad mistake committed by every one as if every one thinks that he knows his child better but in fact child knows about him or her better.
If that freedom is available to the child it need not wait for government alms, under so called reservations and the like, after all every child can carve out its future much more better than the so called governments? thinking process. So it is said SARASWATI/MINERVA bestows particular talent in every child world through the process of procreation.
We did not learn education in ancient India from Europe. We had our own system of gurukul and we had our Nalanda and Taxila and similar such in India so too in china in ancient times. We developed temple architecture, management so too China Pagodas and Chinese management.
Present system will doom Indians for ever.
All we need is development several hundreds of subjects and list them, including languages. Give options for students to pick up subjects that interest them. This system will have to be adopted in all kinds of crafts and technical courses in all levels of schools, colleges and depending upon the kin of pupils or students, the government should make arrangement of teachers? mobility to reach out to students. There will be full attendance in classes and also teachers will find their interests expressed and that means they will not absent in the classes, subject to necessary supervision, if we really mean education for future generation.(ends)
(By Dr. Balakrishnan, former professor, Ex., Education Counselor, advocate, independent director in public limited companies, and visiting faculty in management studies (Bombay/Mumbai/ Pune/ Bangalore universities) UGC resource person attached to Bangalore University.)
Education is the means of art of living, in one?s life sojourn. Routes are different. No school teaches one to the capabilities one has. That is the real problem. Schools provide some set kind of topics or subjects as decided by government, under so called syllabus and curriculum.
Every boy and girl has a particular talent and that need not neatly fit into these so called curriculum / syllabus. You see film actors and theatre actors are talented to portray a role and accordingly the director selects on the basis of story line. You will note all actors will not fit the roles the story line may need. Those that fit the role have the opportunity to act, and that one leads to a box office rating. If you use an actor on the basis of strait jacketed education qualification, then naturally you will find film will miserably fail. So the actor should be exactly able to portray the role to the best possible satisfaction of the spectators.
You can make a technician by the present system of technical education, but when that technician is put to do a job he needs such creative abilities and if he does not he will create a drab cinema. Cinema is totally dependent on actors and hence they are paid astronomical sums of money. Similarly every one has some caliber but if you do not give relevant education fitting his caliber, then he naturally fails. So the word education is to fit in to your talents and what is done all over the world today, you have to fit in your talents to the education provided and hence education is some kind of straight jacket mechanism. Why students drop out, just because that education is not compatible to his talent. But interestingly, we shed all kinds of crocodile tears for the student dropping out of the course. That is the vast gap is created by the present day education. Those who do this straight jacket education will not get really any mark in life, except some make believe kind of capacity, like the people in LEHMAN BROS who all contrived the world economy to go into gloom, in USA, with all kinds of false promises and lies.
Every one created by God is just unique and every one need unique kind of education and some may fit in some collective education but that does not mean all will be fitted into it. So education policies have steadily failed all over centuries and in fact education system decently failed. People run for this decently failed education system.
Parents without knowing the talent of their children submit them to some so called schools/colleges/universities, as if the end of education is in those institutions but it is a sad mistake committed by every one as if every one thinks that he knows his child better but in fact child knows about him or her better.
If that freedom is available to the child it need not wait for government alms, under so called reservations and the like, after all every child can carve out its future much more better than the so called governments? thinking process. So it is said SARASWATI/MINERVA bestows particular talent in every child world through the process of procreation.
We did not learn education in ancient India from Europe. We had our own system of gurukul and we had our Nalanda and Taxila and similar such in India so too in china in ancient times. We developed temple architecture, management so too China Pagodas and Chinese management.
Present system will doom Indians for ever.
All we need is development several hundreds of subjects and list them, including languages. Give options for students to pick up subjects that interest them. This system will have to be adopted in all kinds of crafts and technical courses in all levels of schools, colleges and depending upon the kin of pupils or students, the government should make arrangement of teachers? mobility to reach out to students. There will be full attendance in classes and also teachers will find their interests expressed and that means they will not absent in the classes, subject to necessary supervision, if we really mean education for future generation.(ends)
What is education? Is it that is taught in schools? Is it reliable for you? What do you expect in education? Whether the present systems of education really insure your future? IF not how will you go about?
(By Dr. Balakrishnan, former professor, Ex., Education Counselor, advocate, independent director in public limited companies, and visiting faculty in management studies (Bombay/Mumbai/ Pune/ Bangalore universities) UGC resource person attached to Bangalore University.)
Education is the means of art of living, in one?s life sojourn. Routes are different. No school teaches one to the capabilities one has. That is the real problem. Schools provide some set kind of topics or subjects as decided by government, under so called syllabus and curriculum.
Every boy and girl has a particular talent and that need not neatly fit into these so called curriculum / syllabus. You see film actors and theatre actors are talented to portray a role and accordingly the director selects on the basis of story line. You will note all actors will not fit the roles the story line may need. Those that fit the role have the opportunity to act, and that one leads to a box office rating. If you use an actor on the basis of strait jacketed education qualification, then naturally you will find film will miserably fail. So the actor should be exactly able to portray the role to the best possible satisfaction of the spectators.
You can make a technician by the present system of technical education, but when that technician is put to do a job he needs such creative abilities and if he does not he will create a drab cinema. Cinema is totally dependent on actors and hence they are paid astronomical sums of money. Similarly every one has some caliber but if you do not give relevant education fitting his caliber, then he naturally fails. So the word education is to fit in to your talents and what is done all over the world today, you have to fit in your talents to the education provided and hence education is some kind of straight jacket mechanism. Why students drop out, just because that education is not compatible to his talent. But interestingly, we shed all kinds of crocodile tears for the student dropping out of the course. That is the vast gap is created by the present day education. Those who do this straight jacket education will not get really any mark in life, except some make believe kind of capacity, like the people in LEHMAN BROS who all contrived the world economy to go into gloom, in USA, with all kinds of false promises and lies.
Every one created by God is just unique and every one need unique kind of education and some may fit in some collective education but that does not mean all will be fitted into it. So education policies have steadily failed all over centuries and in fact education system decently failed. People run for this decently failed education system.
Parents without knowing the talent of their children submit them to some so called schools/colleges/universities, as if the end of education is in those institutions but it is a sad mistake committed by every one as if every one thinks that he knows his child better but in fact child knows about him or her better.
If that freedom is available to the child it need not wait for government alms, under so called reservations and the like, after all every child can carve out its future much more better than the so called governments? thinking process. So it is said SARASWATI/MINERVA bestows particular talent in every child world through the process of procreation.
We did not learn education in ancient India from Europe. We had our own system of gurukul and we had our Nalanda and Taxila and similar such in India so too in china in ancient times. We developed temple architecture, management so too China Pagodas and Chinese management.
Present system will doom Indians for ever.
All we need is development several hundreds of subjects and list them, including languages. Give options for students to pick up subjects that interest them. This system will have to be adopted in all kinds of crafts and technical courses in all levels of schools, colleges and depending upon the kin of pupils or students, the government should make arrangement of teachers? mobility to reach out to students. There will be full attendance in classes and also teachers will find their interests expressed and that means they will not absent in the classes, subject to necessary supervision, if we really mean education for future generation.(ends)
class structure..
Class Structure and intelligence in American life ? A challenge? ? How is this catching up in India too of late!
(By Dr. G. Balakrishnan, PhD., a public affairs educational psychologist & Reflexology consultant (a science of understanding of material human body and its functions in different situations)
A high- ?IQ? in an individual increases criminal behavior while low ?IQ? is merely prone to being caught asserts Bell curve in human mind.
Genius a master mind is lonely person. He is very jealously protects himself and he behaves like honey bee stinging. Today ?Our intellectual landscape has been disrupted by equivalent of an earthquake?, said Michael Novak of ?National Review? of America.
Pundit Ravi Shankar is not allowing his son to come up, as he is jealously guarding his genius, like many geniuses of the past, according to a report of recent origin.
Politicians in power mostly imitate low IQ personalities and cannot be treated as genius and they are mostly alleged to be criminal in behavior, as their aim is just to amass wealth right and left. They are likely to be caught and so they use their weight of party bigwigs.
A few are high IQ men are there in politics and they have strangle hold in party politics, e.g., Mayavathi, Rajnath Singh, Bal Thackeray, Raj Thackeray, Amar Singh, Lal Kishen Advani, RSS leaders, Modi of Gujarat, Karunanithi of Tamil nadu, A. Raja, union Minister at union Cabinet, Taliban leader Osama Bin Laden and many of his cohorts, Some LeT-men, so too LTTE-men like late Prabhakaran, Military Rulers of Myanmar, Dictators, to mention a few. But they will face sooner or later problems like being put to sword, as they have more direct and indirect enemies every where.
Edmund Burke said ?There is a most absurd and audacious method of reasoning avowed by bigots and enthusiast, and through Fear assented to by some wiser and better men; it is this. They argue a faire discussion of popular prejudices, because, say they, tho? they would be found without any reasonable Support, yet the Discovery might be productive of the most dangerous consequences. Absurd and blasphemous Nation!. As if all Happiness was not connected with practice of virtue, which necessarily depends upon the Knowledge of Truth. ?(A Vindication of Natural Society)?
It is funny that American situation has dawned on India, may be because most of the high paid MBAs are from Harvard, Wharton ECT Business schools. See Ambanies, and big builders? scions are educated in USA so too politicians?, bureaucrats? and they do not want to fall under RT I Act about their assets information in public domain, meaning thereby they amassed wealth in filthiest possible ways, indicating their criminal bent of IQs.
So too when you note 188 of 288 Maharashtra MLAs will be ?Crorepathies? thro? ill-gotten wealth process, a psyche dominating in political class of criminality.
Due to constraints of space, in some other time another article may carry further story on this aspect. (Ends)
IT MINISTER RAJA SHOULD RESIGN!
Raja shd resign as his ministry is raided by CBI and if CBI Enquiry fails to prove wrong doing Raja can be in cabinet and if not he has to go. DMK party is not important compared to people of india's interests. If DMK insists it is clear that it wants to loot the country. It is not woirth allying with DMK. other parties are there supporting the govt, for instance Samajwadi party.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)